mirror of
https://github.com/refraction-networking/utls.git
synced 2025-04-03 03:57:36 +03:00
crypto/tls: remove typeNextProtocol
Was this strictly necessary? No. Did this deserve its own CL? Maybe not. But I have a personal vendetta against NPN. Change-Id: Ide1ad1092259dc23e3ead5c1d5269fc5cb2793d7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/587275 Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org> Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com> LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
833bba2d07
commit
bbd7da73e1
1 changed files with 0 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ const (
|
|||
typeFinished uint8 = 20
|
||||
typeCertificateStatus uint8 = 22
|
||||
typeKeyUpdate uint8 = 24
|
||||
typeNextProtocol uint8 = 67 // Not IANA assigned
|
||||
typeMessageHash uint8 = 254 // synthetic message
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue