Also check original certificate validity when resuming TLS 1.0–1.2. Will
refuse to resume a session if the certificate is expired or if the
original connection had InsecureSkipVerify and the resumed one doesn't.
Support only PSK+DHE to protect forward secrecy even with lack of a
strong session ticket rotation story.
Tested with NSS because s_server does not provide any way of getting the
same session ticket key across invocations. Will self-test like TLS
1.0–1.2 once server side is implemented.
Incorporates CL 128477 by @santoshankr.
Fixes#24919
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Id3eaa5b6c77544a1357668bf9ff255f3420ecc34
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147420
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
The crypto/tls record layer used a custom buffer implementation with its
own semantics, freelist, and offset management. Replace it all with
per-task bytes.Buffer, bytes.Reader and byte slices, along with a
refactor of all the encrypt and decrypt code.
The main quirk of *block was to do a best-effort read past the record
boundary, so that if a closeNotify was waiting it would be peeked and
surfaced along with the last Read. Address that with atLeastReader and
ReadFrom to avoid a useless copy (instead of a LimitReader or CopyN).
There was also an optimization to split blocks along record boundary
lines without having to copy in and out the data. Replicate that by
aliasing c.input into consumed c.rawInput (after an in-place decrypt
operation). This is safe because c.rawInput is not used until c.input is
drained.
The benchmarks are noisy but look like an improvement across the board,
which is a nice side effect :)
name old time/op new time/op delta
HandshakeServer/RSA-8 817µs ± 2% 797µs ± 2% -2.52% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HandshakeServer/ECDHE-P256-RSA-8 984µs ±11% 897µs ± 0% -8.89% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HandshakeServer/ECDHE-P256-ECDSA-P256-8 206µs ±10% 199µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.113 n=10+9)
HandshakeServer/ECDHE-X25519-ECDSA-P256-8 204µs ± 3% 202µs ± 1% -1.06% (p=0.013 n=10+9)
HandshakeServer/ECDHE-P521-ECDSA-P521-8 15.5ms ± 0% 15.6ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.095 n=9+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/1MB-8 5.35ms ±19% 5.39ms ±36% ~ (p=1.000 n=9+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/2MB-8 9.20ms ±15% 8.30ms ± 8% -9.79% (p=0.035 n=10+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/4MB-8 13.8ms ± 7% 13.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.315 n=10+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/8MB-8 25.1ms ± 3% 23.2ms ± 2% -7.66% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/16MB-8 46.9ms ± 1% 43.0ms ± 3% -8.29% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/32MB-8 88.9ms ± 2% 82.3ms ± 2% -7.40% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/64MB-8 175ms ± 2% 164ms ± 4% -6.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/1MB-8 5.79ms ±26% 5.82ms ±22% ~ (p=0.912 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/2MB-8 9.23ms ±14% 9.50ms ±23% ~ (p=0.971 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/4MB-8 14.5ms ±11% 13.8ms ± 6% -4.66% (p=0.019 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/8MB-8 25.6ms ± 4% 23.5ms ± 3% -8.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/16MB-8 47.3ms ± 3% 44.6ms ± 7% -5.65% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/32MB-8 91.9ms ±14% 85.0ms ± 4% -7.55% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/64MB-8 177ms ± 2% 168ms ± 4% -4.97% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
Latency/MaxPacket/200kbps-8 694ms ± 0% 694ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.315 n=10+9)
Latency/MaxPacket/500kbps-8 279ms ± 0% 279ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.447 n=9+10)
Latency/MaxPacket/1000kbps-8 140ms ± 0% 140ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.661 n=9+10)
Latency/MaxPacket/2000kbps-8 71.1ms ± 0% 71.1ms ± 0% +0.05% (p=0.019 n=9+9)
Latency/MaxPacket/5000kbps-8 30.4ms ± 7% 30.5ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.720 n=9+10)
Latency/DynamicPacket/200kbps-8 134ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.075 n=10+10)
Latency/DynamicPacket/500kbps-8 54.8ms ± 0% 54.8ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.631 n=10+10)
Latency/DynamicPacket/1000kbps-8 28.5ms ± 0% 28.5ms ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=8+8)
Latency/DynamicPacket/2000kbps-8 15.7ms ±12% 16.1ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.109 n=10+7)
Latency/DynamicPacket/5000kbps-8 8.20ms ±26% 8.17ms ±13% ~ (p=1.000 n=9+9)
name old speed new speed delta
Throughput/MaxPacket/1MB-8 193MB/s ±14% 202MB/s ±30% ~ (p=0.897 n=8+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/2MB-8 230MB/s ±14% 249MB/s ±17% ~ (p=0.089 n=10+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/4MB-8 304MB/s ± 6% 309MB/s ± 7% ~ (p=0.315 n=10+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/8MB-8 334MB/s ± 3% 362MB/s ± 2% +8.29% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/16MB-8 358MB/s ± 1% 390MB/s ± 3% +9.08% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/32MB-8 378MB/s ± 2% 408MB/s ± 2% +8.00% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/64MB-8 384MB/s ± 2% 410MB/s ± 4% +6.61% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/1MB-8 178MB/s ±24% 182MB/s ±24% ~ (p=0.604 n=9+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/2MB-8 228MB/s ±13% 225MB/s ±20% ~ (p=0.971 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/4MB-8 291MB/s ±10% 305MB/s ± 6% +4.83% (p=0.019 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/8MB-8 327MB/s ± 4% 357MB/s ± 3% +9.08% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/16MB-8 355MB/s ± 3% 376MB/s ± 6% +6.07% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/32MB-8 366MB/s ±12% 395MB/s ± 4% +7.91% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/64MB-8 380MB/s ± 2% 400MB/s ± 4% +5.26% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
Note that this reduced the buffer for the first read from 1024 to 5+512,
so it triggered the issue described at #24198 when using a synchronous
net.Pipe: the first server flight was not being consumed entirely by the
first read anymore, causing a deadlock as both the client and the server
were trying to send (the client a reply to the ServerHello, the server
the rest of the buffer). Fixed by rebasing on top of CL 142817.
Change-Id: Ie31b0a572b2ad37878469877798d5c6a5276f931
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142818
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Use the format "RFC XXXX, Section X.X" (or "Appendix Y.X") as it fits
more properly in prose than a link, is more future-proof, and as there
are multiple ways to render an RFC. Capital "S" to follow the quoting
standard of RFCs themselves.
Applied the new goimports grouping to all files in those packages, too.
Change-Id: I01267bb3a3b02664f8f822e97b129075bb14d404
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141918
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
This adds support for RSASSA-PSS signatures in handshake messages as
required by TLS 1.3. Even if TLS 1.2 is negotiated, it must support PSS
when advertised in the Client Hello (this will be done later as the
testdata will change).
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I8006b92e017453ae408c153233ce5ccef99b5c3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/79736
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
I tested all fingerprints and confirmed that Chrome and Firefox are
working as intended.
Android fingerprints were grossly unpopular, which could a result of
incorrect merge, but either way we'll remove them for now.
iana.org, www.iana.org and data.iana.org all present a valid TLS
certificate, so let's use it when fetching data or linking to
resources to avoid errors in transit.
Change-Id: Ib3ce7c19789c4e9d982a776b61d8380ddc63194d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/89416
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The root cause of races is that global variables supportedSignatureAlgorithms and
cipherSuites are used both to form handshake and to check whether or not
peer responded with supported algorithm.
In this patch I create separate variables for this purpose.
Updated tests for kicks.
Finally, go fmt.
As is, they were fully vulnerable to the Lucky13 attack. The SHA1
variants implement limited countermeasures (see f28cf8346c4) but the
SHA256 ones are apparently used rarely enough (see 8741504888b) that
it's not worth the extra code.
Instead, disable them by default and update the warning.
Updates #13385
Updates #15487
Change-Id: I45b8b716001e2fa0811b17e25be76e2512e5abb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35290
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matt Layher <mdlayher@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change enables the ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suites by default. This
changes the default ClientHello and thus requires updating all the
tests.
Change-Id: I6683a2647caaff4a11f9e932babb6f07912cad94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30958
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Although an AEAD, in general, can be used concurrently in both the seal
and open directions, TLS is easier. Since the transport keys are
different for different directions in TLS, an AEAD will only ever be
used in one direction. Thus we don't need separate buffers for seal and
open because they can never happen concurrently.
Also, fix the nonce size to twelve bytes since the fixed-prefix
construction for AEADs is superseded and will never be used for anything
else now.
Change-Id: Ibbf6c6b1da0e639f4ee0e3604410945dc7dcbb46
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30959
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This change adds support for the ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD to crypto/tls,
as specified in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7905.
Fixes#15499.
Change-Id: Iaa689be90e03f208c40b574eca399e56f3c7ecf1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30957
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The aim is to make the decrypt() timing profile constant, irrespective of
the CBC padding length or correctness. The old algorithm, on valid padding,
would only MAC bytes up to the padding length threshold, making CBC
ciphersuites vulnerable to plaintext recovery attacks as presented in the
"Lucky Thirteen" paper.
The new algorithm Write()s to the MAC all supposed payload, performs a
constant time Sum()---which required implementing a constant time Sum() in
crypto/sha1, see the "Lucky Microseconds" paper---and then Write()s the rest
of the data. This is performed whether the padding is good or not.
This should have no explicit secret-dependent timings, but it does NOT
attempt to normalize memory accesses to prevent cache timing leaks.
Updates #13385
Change-Id: I15d91dc3cc6eefc1d44f317f72ff8feb0a9888f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18130
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
These were new with TLS 1.2 and, reportedly, some servers require it.
Since it's easy, this change adds suport for three flavours of
AES-128-CBC with SHA-256 MACs.
Other testdata/ files have to be updated because this changes the list
of cipher suites offered by default by the client.
Fixes#15487.
Change-Id: I1b14330c31eeda20185409a37072343552c3464f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27315
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Rudenberg <jonathan@titanous.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
A comment existed referencing RC4 coming before AES because of it's
vulnerability to the Lucky 13 attack. This clarifies that the Lucky 13 attack
only effects AES-CBC, and not AES-GCM.
Fixes#14474
Change-Id: Idcb07b5e0cdb0f9257cf75abea60129ba495b5f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19845
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could
incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both
the CertificateVerify and Finished messages.
TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became
possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the
CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that
one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the
handshake needs to be buffered.
Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures
over the handshake had to use that hash.
However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered
signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the
server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that
set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server.
Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written,
but its out there and we have to deal with it.
This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify
hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but
doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability.
Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the
testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change
only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based
handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the
TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1.
This change also has the effect of adding support for
client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by
default so this should be moot.
It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support
SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces
and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go
in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would
only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear
that'll just cause problems in the future.
Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing
BoringSSL.
Partly addresses #9757
Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Generalizes PRF calculation for TLS 1.2 to support arbitrary hashes (SHA-384 instead of SHA-256).
Testdata were all updated to correspond with the new cipher suites in the handshake.
Change-Id: I3d9fc48c19d1043899e38255a53c80dc952ee08f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3265
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
A new attack on CBC padding in SSLv3 was released yesterday[1]. Go only
supports SSLv3 as a server, not as a client. An easy fix is to change
the default minimum version to TLS 1.0 but that seems a little much
this late in the 1.4 process as it may break some things.
Thus this patch adds server support for TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV[2] -- a
mechanism for solving the fallback problem overall. Chrome has
implemented this since February and Google has urged others to do so in
light of yesterday's news.
With this change, clients can indicate that they are doing a fallback
connection and Go servers will be able to correctly reject them.
[1] http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2014/10/this-poodle-bites-exploiting-ssl-30.html
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-00
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/157090043
