Use the format "RFC XXXX, Section X.X" (or "Appendix Y.X") as it fits
more properly in prose than a link, is more future-proof, and as there
are multiple ways to render an RFC. Capital "S" to follow the quoting
standard of RFCs themselves.
Applied the new goimports grouping to all files in those packages, too.
Change-Id: I01267bb3a3b02664f8f822e97b129075bb14d404
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141918
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
The unexported field is hidden from reflect based marshalers, which
would break otherwise. Also, make it return an error, as there are
multiple reasons it might fail.
Fixes#27125
Change-Id: I92adade2fe456103d2d5c0315629ca0256953764
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/130535
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This adds support for RSASSA-PSS signatures in handshake messages as
required by TLS 1.3. Even if TLS 1.2 is negotiated, it must support PSS
when advertised in the Client Hello (this will be done later as the
testdata will change).
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I8006b92e017453ae408c153233ce5ccef99b5c3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/79736
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
ServerKeyExchange and CertificateVerify can share the same logic for
picking a signature algorithm (based on the certificate public key and
advertised algorithms), selecting a hash algorithm (depending on TLS
version) and signature verification.
Refactor the code to achieve code reuse, have common error checking
(especially for intersecting supported signature algorithms) and to
prepare for addition of new signature algorithms. Code should be easier
to read since version-dependent logic is concentrated at one place.
Change-Id: I978dec3815d28e33c3cfbc85f0c704b1894c25a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/79735
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Each URL was manually verified to ensure it did not serve up incorrect
content.
Change-Id: I4dc846227af95a73ee9a3074d0c379ff0fa955df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/115798
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This change implement keying material export as described in:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5705
I verified the implementation against openssl s_client and openssl
s_server.
Change-Id: I4dcdd2fb929c63ab4e92054616beab6dae7b1c55
Signed-off-by: Mike Danese <mikedanese@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/85115
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
This is the equivalent change to 1c105980 but for SHA-512.
SHA-512 certificates are already supported by default since b53bb2ca,
but some servers will refuse connections if the algorithm is not
advertised in the overloaded signatureAndHash extension (see 09b238f1).
This required adding support for SHA-512 signatures on CertificateVerify
and ServerKeyExchange messages, because of said overloading.
Some testdata/Client-TLSv1{0,1} files changed because they send a 1.2
ClientHello even if the server picks a lower version.
Closes#22422
Change-Id: I16282d03a3040260d203711ec21e6b20a0e1e105
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74950
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Since copy function can figure out how many bytes of data to copy when
two slices have different length, it is not necessary to check how many
bytes need to copy each time before copying the data.
Change-Id: I5151ddfe46af5575566fe9c9a2648e111575ec3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71090
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Consolidate the signature and hash fields (SignatureAndHashAlgorithm in
TLS 1.2) into a single uint16 (SignatureScheme in TLS 1.3 draft 21).
This makes it easier to add RSASSA-PSS for TLS 1.2 in the future.
Fields were named like "signatureAlgorithm" rather than
"signatureScheme" since that name is also used throughout the 1.3 draft.
The only new public symbol is ECDSAWithSHA1, other than that this is an
internal change with no new functionality.
Change-Id: Iba63d262ab1af895420583ac9e302d9705a7e0f0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/62210
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Standardize on space between "RFC" and number. Additionally change
the couple "a RFC" instances to "an RFC."
Fixes#15258
Change-Id: I2b17ecd06be07dfbb4207c690f52a59ea9b04808
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21902
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
In keysFromMasterSecret(), don't copy from serverRandom into
seed[:len(clientRandom)]. Actually, switch from an array to a slice in
keysFromMasterSecret() and masterFromPreMasterSecret() so the length
need not be given; that's how it's done elsewhere in the file.
Fixes#13181
Change-Id: I92abaa892d1bba80c2d4f12776341cda7d538837
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16697
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could
incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both
the CertificateVerify and Finished messages.
TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became
possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the
CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that
one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the
handshake needs to be buffered.
Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures
over the handshake had to use that hash.
However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered
signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the
server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that
set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server.
Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written,
but its out there and we have to deal with it.
This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify
hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but
doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability.
Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the
testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change
only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based
handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the
TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1.
This change also has the effect of adding support for
client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by
default so this should be moot.
It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support
SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces
and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go
in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would
only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear
that'll just cause problems in the future.
Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing
BoringSSL.
Partly addresses #9757
Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Just so that we notice in the future if another hash function is added
without updating this utility function, make it panic when passed an
unknown handshake hash function. (Which should never happen.)
Change-Id: I60a6fc01669441523d8c44e8fbe7ed435e7f04c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7646
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joël Stemmer <stemmertech@gmail.com>
Commit f1d669aee994b28e1afcfe974680565932d25b70 added support for
AES_256_GCM_SHA384 cipher suites as specified in RFC5289. However, it
did not take the arbitrary hash function into account in the TLS client
handshake when using client certificates.
The hashForClientCertificate method always returned SHA256 as its
hashing function, even if it actually used a different one to calculate
its digest. Setting up the connection would eventually fail with the
error "tls: failed to sign handshake with client certificate:
crypto/rsa: input must be hashed message".
Included is an additional test for this specific situation that uses the
SHA384 hash.
Fixes#9808
Change-Id: Iccbf4ab225633471ef897907c208ad31f92855a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7040
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Generalizes PRF calculation for TLS 1.2 to support arbitrary hashes (SHA-384 instead of SHA-256).
Testdata were all updated to correspond with the new cipher suites in the handshake.
Change-Id: I3d9fc48c19d1043899e38255a53c80dc952ee08f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3265
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
