Note that the SignatureSchemes passed to GetClientCertificate in TLS 1.2
are now filtered by the requested certificate type. This feels like an
improvement anyway, and the full list can be surfaced as well when
support for signature_algorithms_cert is added, which actually matches
the semantics of the CertificateRequest signature_algorithms in TLS 1.2.
Also, note a subtle behavior change in server side resumption: if a
certificate is requested but not required, and the resumed session did
not include one, it used not to invoke VerifyPeerCertificate. However,
if the resumed session did include a certificate, it would. (If a
certificate was required but not in the session, the session is rejected
in checkForResumption.) This inconsistency could be unexpected, even
dangerous, so now VerifyPeerCertificate is always invoked. Still not
consistent with the client behavior, which does not ever invoke
VerifyPeerCertificate on resumption, but it felt too surprising to
entirely change either.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Ib2b0dbc30e659208dca3ac07d6c687a407d7aaaf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147599
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Added some assertions to testHandshake, but avoided checking the error
of one of the Close() because the one that would lose the race would
write the closeNotify to a connection closed on the other side which is
broken on js/wasm (#28650). Moved that Close() after the chan sync to
ensure it happens second.
Accepting a ticket with client certificates when NoClientCert is
configured is probably not a problem, and we could hide them to avoid
confusing the application, but the current behavior is to skip the
ticket, and I'd rather keep behavior changes to a minimum.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I93b56e44ddfe3d48c2bef52c83285ba2f46f297a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147445
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Note that there is significant code duplication due to extensions with
the same format appearing in different messages in TLS 1.3. This will be
cleaned up in a future refactor once CL 145317 is merged.
Enforcing the presence/absence of each extension in each message is left
to the upper layer, based on both protocol version and extensions
advertised in CH and CR. Duplicated extensions and unknown extensions in
SH, EE, HRR, and CT will be tightened up in a future CL.
The TLS 1.2 CertificateStatus message was restricted to accepting only
type OCSP as any other type (none of which are specified so far) would
have to be negotiated.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I7c42394c5cc0af01faa84b9b9f25fdc6e7cfbb9e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145477
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
As a first round, rewrite those handshake message types which can be
reused in TLS 1.3 with golang.org/x/crypto/cryptobyte. All other types
changed significantly in TLS 1.3 and will require separate
implementations. They will be ported to cryptobyte in a later CL.
The only semantic changes should be enforcing the random length on the
marshaling side, enforcing a couple more "must not be empty" on the
unmarshaling side, and checking the rest of the SNI list even if we only
take the first.
Change-Id: Idd2ced60c558fafcf02ee489195b6f3b4735fe22
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144115
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
The equal methods were only there for testing, and I remember regularly
getting them wrong while developing tls-tris. Replace them with simple
reflect.DeepEqual calls.
The only special thing that equal() would do is ignore the difference
between a nil and a zero-length slice. Fixed the Generate methods so
that they create the same value that unmarshal will decode. The
difference is not important: it wasn't tested, all checks are
"len(slice) > 0", and all cases in which presence matters are
accompanied by a boolean.
Change-Id: Iaabf56ea17c2406b5107c808c32f6c85b611aaa8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144114
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Use the format "RFC XXXX, Section X.X" (or "Appendix Y.X") as it fits
more properly in prose than a link, is more future-proof, and as there
are multiple ways to render an RFC. Capital "S" to follow the quoting
standard of RFCs themselves.
Applied the new goimports grouping to all files in those packages, too.
Change-Id: I01267bb3a3b02664f8f822e97b129075bb14d404
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141918
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6962#section-3.3, the SCT
must be at least one byte long. The parsing code correctly checks for
this condition, but rarely the test does generate an empty SCT.
Change-Id: If36a34985b4470a5a9f96affc159195c04f6bfad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/129755
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This is a git merge of master into dev.boringcrypto.
The branch was previously based on release-branch.go1.9,
so there are a handful of spurious conflicts that would
also arise if trying to merge master into release-branch.go1.9
(which we never do). Those have all been resolved by taking
the original file from master, discarding any Go 1.9-specific
edits.
all.bash passes on darwin/amd64, which is to say without
actually using BoringCrypto.
Go 1.10-related fixes to BoringCrypto itself will be in a followup CL.
This CL is just the merge.
Change-Id: I4c97711fec0fb86761913dcde28d25c001246c35
Consolidate the signature and hash fields (SignatureAndHashAlgorithm in
TLS 1.2) into a single uint16 (SignatureScheme in TLS 1.3 draft 21).
This makes it easier to add RSASSA-PSS for TLS 1.2 in the future.
Fields were named like "signatureAlgorithm" rather than
"signatureScheme" since that name is also used throughout the 1.3 draft.
The only new public symbol is ECDSAWithSHA1, other than that this is an
internal change with no new functionality.
Change-Id: Iba63d262ab1af895420583ac9e302d9705a7e0f0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/62210
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
It was causing mysterious fuzzing failure because it affects the
unmarshaling of the secureNegotiationSupported field.
Change-Id: Id396b84eab90a3b22fb6e306b10bdd7e39707012
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/60912
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
SNI values may not include a trailing dot according to
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6066#section-3. Although crypto/tls
handled this correctly as a client, it didn't reject this as a server.
This change makes sending an SNI value with a trailing dot a fatal
error.
Updates #18114.
Change-Id: Ib7897ab40e98d4a7a4646ff8469a55233621f631
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33904
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The SignedCertificateTimestampList[1] specifies that both the list and
each element must not be empty. Checking that the list is not empty was
handled in [2] and this change checks that the SCTs themselves are not
zero-length.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6962#section-3.3
[2] https://golang.org/cl/33265
Change-Id: Iabaae7a15f6d111eb079e5086e0bd2005fae9e48
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33355
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When the CT extension is enabled but no SCTs are present, the existing
code calls "continue" which causes resizing the data byte slice to be
skipped. In fact, such extensions should be rejected.
Fixes#17958
Change-Id: Iad12da10d1ea72d04ae2e1012c28bb2636f06bcd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33265
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could
incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both
the CertificateVerify and Finished messages.
TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became
possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the
CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that
one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the
handshake needs to be buffered.
Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures
over the handshake had to use that hash.
However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered
signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the
server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that
set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server.
Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written,
but its out there and we have to deal with it.
This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify
hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but
doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability.
Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the
testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change
only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based
handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the
TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1.
This change also has the effect of adding support for
client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by
default so this should be moot.
It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support
SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces
and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go
in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would
only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear
that'll just cause problems in the future.
Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing
BoringSSL.
Partly addresses #9757
Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
This change adds support for serving and receiving Signed Certificate
Timestamps as described in RFC 6962.
The server is now capable of serving SCTs listed in the Certificate
structure. The client now asks for SCTs and, if any are received,
they are exposed in the ConnectionState structure.
Fixes#10201
Change-Id: Ib3adae98cb4f173bc85cec04d2bdd3aa0fec70bb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/8988
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Rudenberg <jonathan@titanous.com>
