TLS 1.3, which requires RSA-PSS, is now enabled without a GODEBUG
opt-out, and with the introduction of
Certificate.SupportedSignatureAlgorithms (#28660) there is a
programmatic way to avoid RSA-PSS (disable TLS 1.3 with MaxVersion and
use that field to specify only PKCS#1 v1.5 SignatureSchemes).
This effectively reverts 0b3a57b5374bba3fdf88258e2be4c8be65e6a5de,
although following CL 205061 all of the signing-side logic is
conveniently centralized in signatureSchemesForCertificate.
Fixes#32425
Change-Id: I7c9a8893bb5d518d86eae7db82612b9b2cd257d7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205063
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
This will let applications stop crypto/tls from using a certificate key
with an algorithm that is not supported by its crypto.Signer, like
hardware backed keys that can't do RSA-PSS.
Fixes#28660
Change-Id: I294cc06bddf813fff35c5107540c4a1788e1dace
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205062
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Now that we have a full implementation of the logic to check certificate
compatibility, we can let applications just list multiple chains in
Certificates (for example, an RSA and an ECDSA one) and choose the most
appropriate automatically.
NameToCertificate only maps each name to one chain, so simply deprecate
it, and while at it simplify its implementation by not stripping
trailing dots from the SNI (which is specified not to have any, see RFC
6066, Section 3) and by not supporting multi-level wildcards, which are
not a thing in the WebPKI (and in crypto/x509).
The performance of SupportsCertificate without Leaf is poor, but doesn't
affect current users. For now document that, and address it properly in
the next cycle. See #35504.
While cleaning up the Certificates/GetCertificate/GetConfigForClient
behavior, also support leaving Certificates/GetCertificate nil if
GetConfigForClient is set, and send unrecognized_name when there are no
available certificates.
Fixes#29139Fixes#18377
Change-Id: I26604db48806fe4d608388e55da52f34b7ca4566
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205059
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Also, add Version to CertificateRequestInfo, as the semantics of
SignatureSchemes change based on version: the ECDSA SignatureSchemes are
only constrained to a specific curve in TLS 1.3.
Fixes#32426
Change-Id: I7a551bea864799e98118349ac2476162893d1ffd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205058
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
We'll also use this function for a better selection logic from
Config.Certificates in a later CL.
Updates #32426
Change-Id: Ie239574d02eb7fd2cf025ec36721c8c7e082d0bc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205057
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
This refactors a lot of the certificate support logic to make it cleaner
and reusable where possible. These changes will make the following CLs
much simpler.
In particular, the heavily overloaded pickSignatureAlgorithm is gone.
That function used to cover both signing and verifying side, would work
both for pre-signature_algorithms TLS 1.0/1.1 and TLS 1.2, and returned
sigalg, type and hash.
Now, TLS 1.0/1.1 and 1.2 are differentiated at the caller, as they have
effectively completely different logic. TLS 1.0/1.1 simply use
legacyTypeAndHashFromPublicKey as they employ a fixed hash function and
signature algorithm for each public key type. TLS 1.2 is instead routed
through selectSignatureScheme (on the signing side) or
isSupportedSignatureAlgorithm (on the verifying side) and
typeAndHashFromSignatureScheme, like TLS 1.3.
On the signing side, signatureSchemesForCertificate was already version
aware (for PKCS#1 v1.5 vs PSS support), so selectSignatureScheme just
had to learn the Section 7.4.1.4.1 defaults for a missing
signature_algorithms to replace pickSignatureAlgorithm.
On the verifying side, pickSignatureAlgorithm was also checking the
public key type, while isSupportedSignatureAlgorithm +
typeAndHashFromSignatureScheme are not, but that check was redundant
with the one in verifyHandshakeSignature.
There should be no major change in behavior so far. A few minor changes
came from the refactor: we now correctly require signature_algorithms in
TLS 1.3 when using a certificate; we won't use Ed25519 in TLS 1.2 if the
client didn't send signature_algorithms; and we don't send
ec_points_format in the ServerHello (a compatibility measure) if we are
not doing ECDHE anyway because there are no mutually supported curves.
The tests also got simpler because they test simpler functions. The
caller logic switching between TLS 1.0/1.1 and 1.2 is tested by the
transcript tests.
Updates #32426
Change-Id: Ice9dcaea78d204718f661f8d60efdb408ba41577
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205061
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
Also, fix the alert value sent when a signature by a client certificate
is invalid in TLS 1.0-1.2.
Fixes#35190
Change-Id: I2ae1d5593dfd5ee2b4d979664aec74aab4a8a704
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204157
Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
SSLv3 has been irreparably broken since the POODLE attack 5 years ago
and RFC 7568 (f.k.a. draft-ietf-tls-sslv3-diediedie) prohibits its use
in no uncertain terms.
As announced in the Go 1.13 release notes, remove support for it
entirely in Go 1.14.
Updates #32716
Change-Id: Id653557961d8f75f484a01e6afd2e104a4ccceaf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191976
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Signing with RSA-PSS can uncover faulty crypto.Signer implementations,
and it can fail for (broken) small keys. We'll have to take that
breakage eventually, but it would be nice for it to be opt-out at first.
TLS 1.3 requires RSA-PSS and is opt-out in Go 1.13. Instead of making a
TLS 1.3 opt-out influence a TLS 1.2 behavior, let's wait to add RSA-PSS
to TLS 1.2 until TLS 1.3 is on without opt-out.
Note that since the Client Hello is sent before a protocol version is
selected, we have to advertise RSA-PSS there to support TLS 1.3.
That means that we still support RSA-PSS on the client in TLS 1.2 for
verifying server certificates, which is fine, as all issues arise on the
signing side. We have to be careful not to pick (or consider available)
RSA-PSS on the client for client certificates, though.
We'd expect tests to change only in TLS 1.2:
* the server won't pick PSS to sign the key exchange
(Server-TLSv12-* w/ RSA, TestHandshakeServerRSAPSS);
* the server won't advertise PSS in CertificateRequest
(Server-TLSv12-ClientAuthRequested*, TestClientAuth);
* and the client won't pick PSS for its CertificateVerify
(Client-TLSv12-ClientCert-RSA-*, TestHandshakeClientCertRSAPSS,
Client-TLSv12-Renegotiate* because "R" requests a client cert).
Client-TLSv13-ClientCert-RSA-RSAPSS was updated because of a fix in the test.
This effectively reverts 88343530720a52c96b21f2bd5488c8fb607605d7.
Testing was made more complex by the undocumented semantics of OpenSSL's
-[client_]sigalgs (see openssl/openssl#9172).
Updates #32425
Change-Id: Iaddeb2df1f5c75cd090cc8321df2ac8e8e7db349
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/182339
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Support for Ed25519 certificates was added in CL 175478, this wires them
up into the TLS stack according to RFC 8422 (TLS 1.2) and RFC 8446 (TLS 1.3).
RFC 8422 also specifies support for TLS 1.0 and 1.1, and I initially
implemented that, but even OpenSSL doesn't take the complexity, so I
just dropped it. It would have required keeping a buffer of the
handshake transcript in order to do the direct Ed25519 signatures. We
effectively need to support TLS 1.2 because it shares ClientHello
signature algorithms with TLS 1.3.
While at it, reordered the advertised signature algorithms in the rough
order we would want to use them, also based on what curves have fast
constant-time implementations.
Client and client auth tests changed because of the change in advertised
signature algorithms in ClientHello and CertificateRequest.
Fixes#25355
Change-Id: I9fdd839afde4fd6b13fcbc5cc7017fd8c35085ee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/177698
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
In Go 1.13 we will enable RSA-PSS in TLS 1.2 at the same time as we make
TLS 1.3 enabled by default.
This reverts commit 7ccd3583eddcd79679fb29cfc83a6e6fb6973f1e.
Updates #30055
Change-Id: I6f2ddf7652d1172a6b29f4e335ff3a71a89974bc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/163080
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Most of the issues that led to the decision on #30055 were related to
incompatibility with or faulty support for RSA-PSS (#29831, #29779,
v1.5 signatures). RSA-PSS is required by TLS 1.3, but is also available
to be negotiated in TLS 1.2.
Altering TLS 1.2 behavior based on GODEBUG=tls13=1 feels surprising, so
just disable RSA-PSS entirely in TLS 1.2 until TLS 1.3 is on by default,
so breakage happens all at once.
Updates #30055
Change-Id: Iee90454a20ded8895e5302e8bcbcd32e4e3031c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/160998
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
signatureSchemesForCertificate was written to be used with TLS 1.3, but
ended up used for TLS 1.2 client certificates in a refactor. Since it
only supported TLS 1.3 signature algorithms, it would lead to no RSA
client certificates being sent to servers that didn't support RSA-PSS.
TestHandshakeClientCertRSAPKCS1v15 was testing *specifically* for this,
but alas the OpenSSL flag -verify accepts an empty certificates list as
valid, as opposed to -Verify...
Fixes#28925
Change-Id: I61afc02ca501d3d64ab4ad77bbb4cf10931e6f93
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151660
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
The Config does not own the memory pointed to by the Certificate slice.
Instead, opportunistically use Certificate.Leaf and let the application
set it if it desires the performance gain.
This is a partial rollback of CL 107627. See the linked issue for the
full explanation.
Fixes#28744
Change-Id: I33ce9e6712e3f87939d9d0932a06d24e48ba4567
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/149098
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fix a couple overlooked ConnectionState fields noticed by net/http
tests, and add a test in crypto/tls. Spun off CL 147638 to keep that one
cleanly about enabling TLS 1.3.
Change-Id: I9a6c2e68d64518a44be2a5d7b0b7b8d78c98c95d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/148900
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV is extremely fragile in the presence of sparse
supported_version, but gave it the best try I could.
Set the server random canaries but don't check them yet, waiting for the
browsers to clear the way of misbehaving middleboxes.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Ie55efdec671d639cf1e716acef0c5f103e91a7ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147617
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Note that the SignatureSchemes passed to GetClientCertificate in TLS 1.2
are now filtered by the requested certificate type. This feels like an
improvement anyway, and the full list can be surfaced as well when
support for signature_algorithms_cert is added, which actually matches
the semantics of the CertificateRequest signature_algorithms in TLS 1.2.
Also, note a subtle behavior change in server side resumption: if a
certificate is requested but not required, and the resumed session did
not include one, it used not to invoke VerifyPeerCertificate. However,
if the resumed session did include a certificate, it would. (If a
certificate was required but not in the session, the session is rejected
in checkForResumption.) This inconsistency could be unexpected, even
dangerous, so now VerifyPeerCertificate is always invoked. Still not
consistent with the client behavior, which does not ever invoke
VerifyPeerCertificate on resumption, but it felt too surprising to
entirely change either.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Ib2b0dbc30e659208dca3ac07d6c687a407d7aaaf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147599
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Added some assertions to testHandshake, but avoided checking the error
of one of the Close() because the one that would lose the race would
write the closeNotify to a connection closed on the other side which is
broken on js/wasm (#28650). Moved that Close() after the chan sync to
ensure it happens second.
Accepting a ticket with client certificates when NoClientCert is
configured is probably not a problem, and we could hide them to avoid
confusing the application, but the current behavior is to skip the
ticket, and I'd rather keep behavior changes to a minimum.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I93b56e44ddfe3d48c2bef52c83285ba2f46f297a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147445
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Also check original certificate validity when resuming TLS 1.0–1.2. Will
refuse to resume a session if the certificate is expired or if the
original connection had InsecureSkipVerify and the resumed one doesn't.
Support only PSK+DHE to protect forward secrecy even with lack of a
strong session ticket rotation story.
Tested with NSS because s_server does not provide any way of getting the
same session ticket key across invocations. Will self-test like TLS
1.0–1.2 once server side is implemented.
Incorporates CL 128477 by @santoshankr.
Fixes#24919
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Id3eaa5b6c77544a1357668bf9ff255f3420ecc34
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147420
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Since TLS 1.3 delivers handshake messages (including KeyUpdate) after
the handshake, the want argument to readRecord had became almost
pointless: it only meant something when set to recordTypeChangeCipherSpec.
Replaced it with a bool to reflect that, and added two shorthands to
avoid anonymous bools in calls.
Took the occasion to simplify and formalize the invariants of readRecord.
The maxConsecutiveEmptyRecords loop became useless when readRecord
started retrying on any non-advancing record in CL 145297.
Replaced panics with errors, because failure is better than undefined
behavior, but contained failure is better than a DoS vulnerability. For
example, I suspect the panic at the top of readRecord was reachable from
handleRenegotiation, which calls readHandshake with handshakeComplete
false. Thankfully it was not a panic in 1.11, and it's allowed now.
Removed Client-TLSv13-RenegotiationRejected because OpenSSL isn't
actually willing to ask for renegotiation over TLS 1.3, the expected
error was due to NewSessionTicket messages, which didn't break the rest
of the tests because they stop too soon.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I297a81bde5c8020a962a92891b70d6d70b90f5e3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147418
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Also, add support for the SSLKEYLOGFILE environment variable to the
tests, to simplify debugging of unexpected failures.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I20a34a5824f083da93097b793d51e796d6eb302b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147417
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Implement a basic TLS 1.3 server handshake, only enabled if explicitly
requested with MaxVersion.
This CL intentionally leaves for future CLs:
- PSK modes and resumption
- client authentication
- compatibility mode ChangeCipherSpecs
- early data skipping
- post-handshake messages
- downgrade protection
- KeyLogWriter support
- TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV processing
It also leaves a few areas up for a wider refactor (maybe in Go 1.13):
- the certificate selection logic can be significantly improved,
including supporting and surfacing signature_algorithms_cert, but
this isn't new in TLS 1.3 (see comment in processClientHello)
- handshake_server_tls13.go can be dried up and broken into more
meaningful, smaller functions, but it felt premature to do before
PSK and client auth support
- the monstrous ClientHello equality check in doHelloRetryRequest can
get both cleaner and more complete with collaboration from the
parsing layer, which can come at the same time as extension
duplicates detection
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Id9db2b6ecc2eea21bf9b59b6d1d9c84a7435151c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147017
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
crypto/x509 already supports PSS signatures (with rsaEncryption OID),
and crypto/tls support was added in CL 79736. Advertise support for the
algorithms and accept them as a peer.
Note that this is about PSS signatures from regular RSA public keys.
RSA-PSS only public keys (with RSASSA-PSS OID) are supported in neither
crypto/tls nor crypto/x509. See RFC 8446, Section 4.2.3.
testdata/Server-TLSv12-ClientAuthRequested* got modified because the
CertificateRequest carries the supported signature algorithms.
The net/smtp tests changed because 512 bits keys are too small for PSS.
Based on Peter Wu's CL 79738, who did all the actual work in CL 79736.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I4a31e9c6e152ff4c50a5c8a274edd610d5fff231
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146258
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
RFC 8446 recommends using the supported_versions extension to negotiate
lower versions as well, so begin by implementing it to negotiate the
currently supported versions.
Note that pickTLSVersion was incorrectly negotiating the ServerHello
version down on the client. If the server had illegally sent a version
higher than the ClientHello version, the client would have just
downgraded it, hopefully failing later in the handshake.
In TestGetConfigForClient, we were hitting the record version check
because the server would select TLS 1.1, the handshake would fail on the
client which required TLS 1.2, which would then send a TLS 1.0 record
header on its fatal alert (not having negotiated a version), while the
server would expect a TLS 1.1 header at that point. Now, the client gets
to communicate the minimum version through the extension and the
handshake fails on the server.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Ie33c7124c0c769f62e10baad51cbed745c424e5b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146217
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Note that there is significant code duplication due to extensions with
the same format appearing in different messages in TLS 1.3. This will be
cleaned up in a future refactor once CL 145317 is merged.
Enforcing the presence/absence of each extension in each message is left
to the upper layer, based on both protocol version and extensions
advertised in CH and CR. Duplicated extensions and unknown extensions in
SH, EE, HRR, and CT will be tightened up in a future CL.
The TLS 1.2 CertificateStatus message was restricted to accepting only
type OCSP as any other type (none of which are specified so far) would
have to be negotiated.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I7c42394c5cc0af01faa84b9b9f25fdc6e7cfbb9e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145477
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
I am working on a TLS server program, which issues new TLS certificates
on demand. The new certificates will be added into tls.Config.Certificates.
BuildNameToCertificate will be called to refresh the name table afterwards.
This change will reduce some workload on existing certificates.
Note that you can’t modify the Certificates field (or call BuildNameToCertificate)
on a Config in use by a Server. You can however modify an unused Config that gets
cloned in GetConfigForClient with appropriate locking.
Change-Id: I7bdb7d23fc5d68df83c73f3bfa3ba9181d38fbde
GitHub-Last-Rev: c3788f4116be47f2fdb777935c421e7dd694f5c8
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#24920
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/107627
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
This change will aid users to make less mistakes where you, for example, define both HTTP/1.1 and H2, but in the wrong order.
package main
import (
"crypto/tls"
"net"
)
func main() {
srv := &http.Server{
TLSConfig: &tls.Config{
NextProtos: []string{"http/1.1", "h2"},
},
}
srv.ListenAndServeTLS("server.crt", "server.key")
}
When using major browsers or curl, they will never be served H2 since they also support HTTP/1.0 and the list is processed in order.
Change-Id: Id14098b5e48f624ca308137917874d475c2f22a0
GitHub-Last-Rev: f3594a6411bf7dde71c850f3e85a2b5a21974129
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#28367
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144387
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Use the format "RFC XXXX, Section X.X" (or "Appendix Y.X") as it fits
more properly in prose than a link, is more future-proof, and as there
are multiple ways to render an RFC. Capital "S" to follow the quoting
standard of RFCs themselves.
Applied the new goimports grouping to all files in those packages, too.
Change-Id: I01267bb3a3b02664f8f822e97b129075bb14d404
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141918
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
The unexported field is hidden from reflect based marshalers, which
would break otherwise. Also, make it return an error, as there are
multiple reasons it might fail.
Fixes#27125
Change-Id: I92adade2fe456103d2d5c0315629ca0256953764
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/130535
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Use the dedicated AES* and PMULL* instructions to accelerate AES-GCM
name old time/op new time/op delta
AESGCMSeal1K-46 12.1µs ± 0% 0.9µs ± 0% -92.66% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
AESGCMOpen1K-46 12.1µs ± 0% 0.9µs ± 0% -92.43% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
AESGCMSign8K-46 58.6µs ± 0% 2.1µs ± 0% -96.41% (p=0.000 n=9+8)
AESGCMSeal8K-46 92.8µs ± 0% 5.7µs ± 0% -93.86% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
AESGCMOpen8K-46 92.9µs ± 0% 5.7µs ± 0% -93.84% (p=0.000 n=8+9)
name old speed new speed delta
AESGCMSeal1K-46 84.7MB/s ± 0% 1153.4MB/s ± 0% +1262.21% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
AESGCMOpen1K-46 84.4MB/s ± 0% 1115.2MB/s ± 0% +1220.53% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
AESGCMSign8K-46 140MB/s ± 0% 3894MB/s ± 0% +2687.50% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
AESGCMSeal8K-46 88.2MB/s ± 0% 1437.5MB/s ± 0% +1529.30% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
AESGCMOpen8K-46 88.2MB/s ± 0% 1430.5MB/s ± 0% +1522.01% (p=0.000 n=8+9)
This change mirrors the current amd64 implementation, and provides optimal performance
on a range of arm64 processors including Centriq 2400 and Apple A12. By and large it is
implicitly tested by the robustness of the already existing amd64 implementation.
The implementation interleaves GHASH with CTR mode to achieve the highest possible
throughput, it also aggregates GHASH with a factor of 8, to decrease the cost of the
reduction step.
Even thought there is a significant amount of assembly, the code reuses the go
code for the amd64 implementation, so there is little additional go code.
Since AES-GCM is critical for performance of all web servers, this change is
required to level the playfield for arm64 CPUs, where amd64 currently enjoys an
unfair advantage.
Ideally both amd64 and arm64 codepaths could be replaced by hypothetical AES and
CLMUL intrinsics, with a few additional vector instructions.
Fixes#18498Fixes#19840
Change-Id: Icc57b868cd1f67ac695c1ac163a8e215f74c7910
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107298
Run-TryBot: Vlad Krasnov <vlad@cloudflare.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This adds support for RSASSA-PSS signatures in handshake messages as
required by TLS 1.3. Even if TLS 1.2 is negotiated, it must support PSS
when advertised in the Client Hello (this will be done later as the
testdata will change).
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I8006b92e017453ae408c153233ce5ccef99b5c3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/79736
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Hardware AES support in Go on s390x currently requires ECB, CBC
and CTR modes be available. It also requires that either the
GHASH or GCM facilities are available. The existing checks missed
some of these constraints.
While we're here simplify the cpu package on s390x, moving masking
code out of assembly and into Go code. Also, update SHA-{1,256,512}
implementations to use the cpu package since that is now trivial.
Finally I also added a test for internal/cpu on s390x which loads
/proc/cpuinfo and checks it against the flags set by internal/cpu.
Updates #25822 for changes to vet whitelist.
Change-Id: Iac4183f571643209e027f730989c60a811c928eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/114397
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Users are sometimes confused why session tickets are not enabled even if
SessionTicketsDisabled is false.
Change-Id: I3b783d2cf3eed693a3ad6acb40a8003db7e0b648
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/117255
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Each URL was manually verified to ensure it did not serve up incorrect
content.
Change-Id: I4dc846227af95a73ee9a3074d0c379ff0fa955df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/115798
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When the internal/cpu package was introduced, the AES package still used
the custom crypto/internal/cipherhw package for amd64 and s390x. This
change removes that package entirely in favor of directly referencing the
cpu feature flags set and exposed by the internal/cpu package. In
addition, 5 new flags have been added to the internal/cpu s390x struct
for detecting various cipher message (KM) features.
Change-Id: I77cdd8bc1b04ab0e483b21bf1879b5801a4ba5f4
GitHub-Last-Rev: a611e3ecb1f480dcbfce3cb0c8c9e4058f56c1a4
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#24766
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105695
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change implement keying material export as described in:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5705
I verified the implementation against openssl s_client and openssl
s_server.
Change-Id: I4dcdd2fb929c63ab4e92054616beab6dae7b1c55
Signed-off-by: Mike Danese <mikedanese@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/85115
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
iana.org, www.iana.org and data.iana.org all present a valid TLS
certificate, so let's use it when fetching data or linking to
resources to avoid errors in transit.
Change-Id: Ib3ce7c19789c4e9d982a776b61d8380ddc63194d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/89416
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
In the current implementation, it is possible for a client to
continuously send warning alerts, which are just dropped on the floor
inside readRecord.
This can enable scenarios in where someone can try to continuously
send warning alerts to the server just to keep it busy.
This CL implements a simple counter that triggers an error if
we hit the warning alert limit.
Fixes#22543
Change-Id: Ief0ca10308cf5a4dea21a5a67d3e8f6501912da6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/75750
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
