Adds support for following TLS 1.3 extensions:
- PSKKeyExchangeModes
- SupportedVersions
- KeyShare
and uses them to implement newest Chrome and Firefox parrots.
Tests for default Golang uTLS were regenerated because
they previously used TLS-1.2 as max version.
The Config does not own the memory pointed to by the Certificate slice.
Instead, opportunistically use Certificate.Leaf and let the application
set it if it desires the performance gain.
This is a partial rollback of CL 107627. See the linked issue for the
full explanation.
Fixes#28744
Change-Id: I33ce9e6712e3f87939d9d0932a06d24e48ba4567
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/149098
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fix a couple overlooked ConnectionState fields noticed by net/http
tests, and add a test in crypto/tls. Spun off CL 147638 to keep that one
cleanly about enabling TLS 1.3.
Change-Id: I9a6c2e68d64518a44be2a5d7b0b7b8d78c98c95d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/148900
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV is extremely fragile in the presence of sparse
supported_version, but gave it the best try I could.
Set the server random canaries but don't check them yet, waiting for the
browsers to clear the way of misbehaving middleboxes.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Ie55efdec671d639cf1e716acef0c5f103e91a7ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147617
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Note that the SignatureSchemes passed to GetClientCertificate in TLS 1.2
are now filtered by the requested certificate type. This feels like an
improvement anyway, and the full list can be surfaced as well when
support for signature_algorithms_cert is added, which actually matches
the semantics of the CertificateRequest signature_algorithms in TLS 1.2.
Also, note a subtle behavior change in server side resumption: if a
certificate is requested but not required, and the resumed session did
not include one, it used not to invoke VerifyPeerCertificate. However,
if the resumed session did include a certificate, it would. (If a
certificate was required but not in the session, the session is rejected
in checkForResumption.) This inconsistency could be unexpected, even
dangerous, so now VerifyPeerCertificate is always invoked. Still not
consistent with the client behavior, which does not ever invoke
VerifyPeerCertificate on resumption, but it felt too surprising to
entirely change either.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Ib2b0dbc30e659208dca3ac07d6c687a407d7aaaf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147599
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Added some assertions to testHandshake, but avoided checking the error
of one of the Close() because the one that would lose the race would
write the closeNotify to a connection closed on the other side which is
broken on js/wasm (#28650). Moved that Close() after the chan sync to
ensure it happens second.
Accepting a ticket with client certificates when NoClientCert is
configured is probably not a problem, and we could hide them to avoid
confusing the application, but the current behavior is to skip the
ticket, and I'd rather keep behavior changes to a minimum.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I93b56e44ddfe3d48c2bef52c83285ba2f46f297a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147445
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Also check original certificate validity when resuming TLS 1.0–1.2. Will
refuse to resume a session if the certificate is expired or if the
original connection had InsecureSkipVerify and the resumed one doesn't.
Support only PSK+DHE to protect forward secrecy even with lack of a
strong session ticket rotation story.
Tested with NSS because s_server does not provide any way of getting the
same session ticket key across invocations. Will self-test like TLS
1.0–1.2 once server side is implemented.
Incorporates CL 128477 by @santoshankr.
Fixes#24919
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Id3eaa5b6c77544a1357668bf9ff255f3420ecc34
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147420
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Looks like the introduction of CCS records in the client second flight
gave time to s_server to send NewSessionTicket messages in between the
client application data and close_notify. There seems to be no way of
turning NewSessionTicket messages off, neither by not sending a
psk_key_exchange_modes extension, nor by command line flag.
Interleaving the client write like that tickled an issue akin to #18701:
on Windows, the client reaches Close() before the last record is drained
from the send buffer, the kernel notices and resets the connection,
cutting short the last flow. There is no good way of synchronizing this,
so we sleep for a RTT before calling close, like in CL 75210. Sigh.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I44dc1cca17b373695b5a18c2741f218af2990bd1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147419
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Since TLS 1.3 delivers handshake messages (including KeyUpdate) after
the handshake, the want argument to readRecord had became almost
pointless: it only meant something when set to recordTypeChangeCipherSpec.
Replaced it with a bool to reflect that, and added two shorthands to
avoid anonymous bools in calls.
Took the occasion to simplify and formalize the invariants of readRecord.
The maxConsecutiveEmptyRecords loop became useless when readRecord
started retrying on any non-advancing record in CL 145297.
Replaced panics with errors, because failure is better than undefined
behavior, but contained failure is better than a DoS vulnerability. For
example, I suspect the panic at the top of readRecord was reachable from
handleRenegotiation, which calls readHandshake with handshakeComplete
false. Thankfully it was not a panic in 1.11, and it's allowed now.
Removed Client-TLSv13-RenegotiationRejected because OpenSSL isn't
actually willing to ask for renegotiation over TLS 1.3, the expected
error was due to NewSessionTicket messages, which didn't break the rest
of the tests because they stop too soon.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I297a81bde5c8020a962a92891b70d6d70b90f5e3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147418
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Also, add support for the SSLKEYLOGFILE environment variable to the
tests, to simplify debugging of unexpected failures.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I20a34a5824f083da93097b793d51e796d6eb302b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147417
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Now, this is embarrassing. While preparing CL 142818, I noticed a
possible vulnerability in the existing code which I was rewriting. I
took a note to go back and assess if it was indeed an issue, and in case
start the security release process. The note unintentionally slipped
into the commit. Fortunately, there was no vulnerability.
What caught my eye was that I had fixed the calculation of the minimum
encrypted payload length from
roundUp(explicitIVLen+macSize+1, blockSize)
to (using the same variable names)
explicitIVLen + roundUp(macSize+1, blockSize)
The explicit nonce sits outside of the encrypted payload, so it should
not be part of the value rounded up to the CBC block size.
You can see that for some values of the above, the old result could be
lower than the correct value. An unexpectedly short payload might cause
a panic during decryption (a DoS vulnerability) or even more serious
issues due to the constant time code that follows it (see for example
Yet Another Padding Oracle in OpenSSL CBC Ciphersuites [1]).
In practice, explicitIVLen is either zero or equal to blockSize, so it
does not change the amount of rounding up necessary and the two
formulations happen to be identical. Nothing to see here.
It looked more suspicious than it is in part due to the fact that the
explicitIVLen definition moved farther into hc.explicitNonceLen() and
changed name from IV (which suggests a block length) to nonce (which
doesn't necessarily). But anyway it was never meant to surface or be
noted, except it slipped, so here we are for a boring explanation.
[1] https://blog.cloudflare.com/yet-another-padding-oracle-in-openssl-cbc-ciphersuites/
Change-Id: I365560dfe006513200fa877551ce7afec9115fdf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147637
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Implement a basic TLS 1.3 server handshake, only enabled if explicitly
requested with MaxVersion.
This CL intentionally leaves for future CLs:
- PSK modes and resumption
- client authentication
- compatibility mode ChangeCipherSpecs
- early data skipping
- post-handshake messages
- downgrade protection
- KeyLogWriter support
- TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV processing
It also leaves a few areas up for a wider refactor (maybe in Go 1.13):
- the certificate selection logic can be significantly improved,
including supporting and surfacing signature_algorithms_cert, but
this isn't new in TLS 1.3 (see comment in processClientHello)
- handshake_server_tls13.go can be dried up and broken into more
meaningful, smaller functions, but it felt premature to do before
PSK and client auth support
- the monstrous ClientHello equality check in doHelloRetryRequest can
get both cleaner and more complete with collaboration from the
parsing layer, which can come at the same time as extension
duplicates detection
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Id9db2b6ecc2eea21bf9b59b6d1d9c84a7435151c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147017
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
crypto/x509 already supports PSS signatures (with rsaEncryption OID),
and crypto/tls support was added in CL 79736. Advertise support for the
algorithms and accept them as a peer.
Note that this is about PSS signatures from regular RSA public keys.
RSA-PSS only public keys (with RSASSA-PSS OID) are supported in neither
crypto/tls nor crypto/x509. See RFC 8446, Section 4.2.3.
testdata/Server-TLSv12-ClientAuthRequested* got modified because the
CertificateRequest carries the supported signature algorithms.
The net/smtp tests changed because 512 bits keys are too small for PSS.
Based on Peter Wu's CL 79738, who did all the actual work in CL 79736.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I4a31e9c6e152ff4c50a5c8a274edd610d5fff231
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146258
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
RFC 8446 recommends using the supported_versions extension to negotiate
lower versions as well, so begin by implementing it to negotiate the
currently supported versions.
Note that pickTLSVersion was incorrectly negotiating the ServerHello
version down on the client. If the server had illegally sent a version
higher than the ClientHello version, the client would have just
downgraded it, hopefully failing later in the handshake.
In TestGetConfigForClient, we were hitting the record version check
because the server would select TLS 1.1, the handshake would fail on the
client which required TLS 1.2, which would then send a TLS 1.0 record
header on its fatal alert (not having negotiated a version), while the
server would expect a TLS 1.1 header at that point. Now, the client gets
to communicate the minimum version through the extension and the
handshake fails on the server.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: Ie33c7124c0c769f62e10baad51cbed745c424e5b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146217
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Note that there is significant code duplication due to extensions with
the same format appearing in different messages in TLS 1.3. This will be
cleaned up in a future refactor once CL 145317 is merged.
Enforcing the presence/absence of each extension in each message is left
to the upper layer, based on both protocol version and extensions
advertised in CH and CR. Duplicated extensions and unknown extensions in
SH, EE, HRR, and CT will be tightened up in a future CL.
The TLS 1.2 CertificateStatus message was restricted to accepting only
type OCSP as any other type (none of which are specified so far) would
have to be negotiated.
Updates #9671
Change-Id: I7c42394c5cc0af01faa84b9b9f25fdc6e7cfbb9e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145477
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
I am working on a TLS server program, which issues new TLS certificates
on demand. The new certificates will be added into tls.Config.Certificates.
BuildNameToCertificate will be called to refresh the name table afterwards.
This change will reduce some workload on existing certificates.
Note that you can’t modify the Certificates field (or call BuildNameToCertificate)
on a Config in use by a Server. You can however modify an unused Config that gets
cloned in GetConfigForClient with appropriate locking.
Change-Id: I7bdb7d23fc5d68df83c73f3bfa3ba9181d38fbde
GitHub-Last-Rev: c3788f4116be47f2fdb777935c421e7dd694f5c8
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#24920
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/107627
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
This change will aid users to make less mistakes where you, for example, define both HTTP/1.1 and H2, but in the wrong order.
package main
import (
"crypto/tls"
"net"
)
func main() {
srv := &http.Server{
TLSConfig: &tls.Config{
NextProtos: []string{"http/1.1", "h2"},
},
}
srv.ListenAndServeTLS("server.crt", "server.key")
}
When using major browsers or curl, they will never be served H2 since they also support HTTP/1.0 and the list is processed in order.
Change-Id: Id14098b5e48f624ca308137917874d475c2f22a0
GitHub-Last-Rev: f3594a6411bf7dde71c850f3e85a2b5a21974129
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#28367
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144387
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
As a first round, rewrite those handshake message types which can be
reused in TLS 1.3 with golang.org/x/crypto/cryptobyte. All other types
changed significantly in TLS 1.3 and will require separate
implementations. They will be ported to cryptobyte in a later CL.
The only semantic changes should be enforcing the random length on the
marshaling side, enforcing a couple more "must not be empty" on the
unmarshaling side, and checking the rest of the SNI list even if we only
take the first.
Change-Id: Idd2ced60c558fafcf02ee489195b6f3b4735fe22
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144115
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
The arm5 and mips builders are can't-send-a-packet-to-localhost-in-1s
slow apparently. 1m is less useful, but still better than an obscure
test timeout panic.
Fixes#28405
Change-Id: I2feeae6ea1b095114caccaab4f6709f405faebad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145037
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The equal methods were only there for testing, and I remember regularly
getting them wrong while developing tls-tris. Replace them with simple
reflect.DeepEqual calls.
The only special thing that equal() would do is ignore the difference
between a nil and a zero-length slice. Fixed the Generate methods so
that they create the same value that unmarshal will decode. The
difference is not important: it wasn't tested, all checks are
"len(slice) > 0", and all cases in which presence matters are
accompanied by a boolean.
Change-Id: Iaabf56ea17c2406b5107c808c32f6c85b611aaa8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144114
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
If something causes the recorded tests to deviate from the expected
flows, they might wait forever for data that is not coming. Add a short
timeout, after which a useful error message is shown.
Change-Id: Ib11ccc0e17dcb8b2180493556017275678abbb08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144116
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
This adds a crypto/tls.RecordHeaderError.Conn field containing the TLS
underlying net.Conn for non-TLS handshake errors, and then uses it in
the net/http Server to return plaintext HTTP 400 errors when a client
mistakenly sends a plaintext HTTP request to an HTTPS server. This is the
same behavior as Apache.
Also in crypto/tls: swap two error paths to not use a value before
it's valid, and don't send a alert record when a handshake contains a
bogus TLS record (a TLS record in response won't help a non-TLS
client).
Fixes#23689
Change-Id: Ife774b1e3886beb66f25ae4587c62123ccefe847
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/143177
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
The crypto/tls record layer used a custom buffer implementation with its
own semantics, freelist, and offset management. Replace it all with
per-task bytes.Buffer, bytes.Reader and byte slices, along with a
refactor of all the encrypt and decrypt code.
The main quirk of *block was to do a best-effort read past the record
boundary, so that if a closeNotify was waiting it would be peeked and
surfaced along with the last Read. Address that with atLeastReader and
ReadFrom to avoid a useless copy (instead of a LimitReader or CopyN).
There was also an optimization to split blocks along record boundary
lines without having to copy in and out the data. Replicate that by
aliasing c.input into consumed c.rawInput (after an in-place decrypt
operation). This is safe because c.rawInput is not used until c.input is
drained.
The benchmarks are noisy but look like an improvement across the board,
which is a nice side effect :)
name old time/op new time/op delta
HandshakeServer/RSA-8 817µs ± 2% 797µs ± 2% -2.52% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HandshakeServer/ECDHE-P256-RSA-8 984µs ±11% 897µs ± 0% -8.89% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
HandshakeServer/ECDHE-P256-ECDSA-P256-8 206µs ±10% 199µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.113 n=10+9)
HandshakeServer/ECDHE-X25519-ECDSA-P256-8 204µs ± 3% 202µs ± 1% -1.06% (p=0.013 n=10+9)
HandshakeServer/ECDHE-P521-ECDSA-P521-8 15.5ms ± 0% 15.6ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.095 n=9+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/1MB-8 5.35ms ±19% 5.39ms ±36% ~ (p=1.000 n=9+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/2MB-8 9.20ms ±15% 8.30ms ± 8% -9.79% (p=0.035 n=10+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/4MB-8 13.8ms ± 7% 13.6ms ± 8% ~ (p=0.315 n=10+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/8MB-8 25.1ms ± 3% 23.2ms ± 2% -7.66% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/16MB-8 46.9ms ± 1% 43.0ms ± 3% -8.29% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/32MB-8 88.9ms ± 2% 82.3ms ± 2% -7.40% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/64MB-8 175ms ± 2% 164ms ± 4% -6.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/1MB-8 5.79ms ±26% 5.82ms ±22% ~ (p=0.912 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/2MB-8 9.23ms ±14% 9.50ms ±23% ~ (p=0.971 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/4MB-8 14.5ms ±11% 13.8ms ± 6% -4.66% (p=0.019 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/8MB-8 25.6ms ± 4% 23.5ms ± 3% -8.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/16MB-8 47.3ms ± 3% 44.6ms ± 7% -5.65% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/32MB-8 91.9ms ±14% 85.0ms ± 4% -7.55% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/64MB-8 177ms ± 2% 168ms ± 4% -4.97% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
Latency/MaxPacket/200kbps-8 694ms ± 0% 694ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.315 n=10+9)
Latency/MaxPacket/500kbps-8 279ms ± 0% 279ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.447 n=9+10)
Latency/MaxPacket/1000kbps-8 140ms ± 0% 140ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.661 n=9+10)
Latency/MaxPacket/2000kbps-8 71.1ms ± 0% 71.1ms ± 0% +0.05% (p=0.019 n=9+9)
Latency/MaxPacket/5000kbps-8 30.4ms ± 7% 30.5ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.720 n=9+10)
Latency/DynamicPacket/200kbps-8 134ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.075 n=10+10)
Latency/DynamicPacket/500kbps-8 54.8ms ± 0% 54.8ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.631 n=10+10)
Latency/DynamicPacket/1000kbps-8 28.5ms ± 0% 28.5ms ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=8+8)
Latency/DynamicPacket/2000kbps-8 15.7ms ±12% 16.1ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.109 n=10+7)
Latency/DynamicPacket/5000kbps-8 8.20ms ±26% 8.17ms ±13% ~ (p=1.000 n=9+9)
name old speed new speed delta
Throughput/MaxPacket/1MB-8 193MB/s ±14% 202MB/s ±30% ~ (p=0.897 n=8+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/2MB-8 230MB/s ±14% 249MB/s ±17% ~ (p=0.089 n=10+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/4MB-8 304MB/s ± 6% 309MB/s ± 7% ~ (p=0.315 n=10+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/8MB-8 334MB/s ± 3% 362MB/s ± 2% +8.29% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/16MB-8 358MB/s ± 1% 390MB/s ± 3% +9.08% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Throughput/MaxPacket/32MB-8 378MB/s ± 2% 408MB/s ± 2% +8.00% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Throughput/MaxPacket/64MB-8 384MB/s ± 2% 410MB/s ± 4% +6.61% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/1MB-8 178MB/s ±24% 182MB/s ±24% ~ (p=0.604 n=9+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/2MB-8 228MB/s ±13% 225MB/s ±20% ~ (p=0.971 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/4MB-8 291MB/s ±10% 305MB/s ± 6% +4.83% (p=0.019 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/8MB-8 327MB/s ± 4% 357MB/s ± 3% +9.08% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/16MB-8 355MB/s ± 3% 376MB/s ± 6% +6.07% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/32MB-8 366MB/s ±12% 395MB/s ± 4% +7.91% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Throughput/DynamicPacket/64MB-8 380MB/s ± 2% 400MB/s ± 4% +5.26% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
Note that this reduced the buffer for the first read from 1024 to 5+512,
so it triggered the issue described at #24198 when using a synchronous
net.Pipe: the first server flight was not being consumed entirely by the
first read anymore, causing a deadlock as both the client and the server
were trying to send (the client a reply to the ServerHello, the server
the rest of the buffer). Fixed by rebasing on top of CL 142817.
Change-Id: Ie31b0a572b2ad37878469877798d5c6a5276f931
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142818
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
crypto/tls is meant to work over network connections with buffering, not
synchronous connections, as explained in #24198. Tests based on net.Pipe
are unrealistic as reads and writes are matched one to one. Such tests
worked just thanks to the implementation details of the tls.Conn
internal buffering, and would break if for example the flush of the
first flight of the server was not entirely assimilated by the client
rawInput buffer before the client attempted to reply to the ServerHello.
Note that this might run into the Darwin network issues at #25696.
Fixed a few test races that were either hidden or synchronized by the
use of the in-memory net.Pipe.
Also, this gets us slightly more realistic benchmarks, reflecting some
syscall cost of Read and Write operations.
Change-Id: I5a597b3d7a81b8ccc776030cc837133412bf50f8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142817
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Use the format "RFC XXXX, Section X.X" (or "Appendix Y.X") as it fits
more properly in prose than a link, is more future-proof, and as there
are multiple ways to render an RFC. Capital "S" to follow the quoting
standard of RFCs themselves.
Applied the new goimports grouping to all files in those packages, too.
Change-Id: I01267bb3a3b02664f8f822e97b129075bb14d404
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/141918
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6962#section-3.3, the SCT
must be at least one byte long. The parsing code correctly checks for
this condition, but rarely the test does generate an empty SCT.
Change-Id: If36a34985b4470a5a9f96affc159195c04f6bfad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/129755
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The unexported field is hidden from reflect based marshalers, which
would break otherwise. Also, make it return an error, as there are
multiple reasons it might fail.
Fixes#27125
Change-Id: I92adade2fe456103d2d5c0315629ca0256953764
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/130535
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
