DarkCat09 · he/him
1 follower · 2 following
Repositories
59
 Projects Packages
3
 Public activity Starred repositories
2
DarkCat09 created repository DarkCat09/keyoxide_proof 2025-03-27 17:09:38 +03:00
DarkCat09 transferred repository mirrors/sing-box to SagerNet/sing-box 2025-03-17 20:08:43 +03:00
DarkCat09 pushed to main at DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped 2025-03-14 17:29:39 +03:00
1cec87ce45 fix: do not fail if no volume provided
1bcc578fa1 chore: cleanup action yml
83b5771fdf fix(deps): return zip&unzip
415afaee09 fix: apt-get, no readline
3f75cded58 perf: add -O3 and lto
Compare 8 commits »
DarkCat09 opened issue DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#5 2025-03-14 17:23:38 +03:00
ci: publish jdk and jre as archives
DarkCat09 commented on issue DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#4 2025-03-14 17:22:18 +03:00
ci: check remote repos for updates

OK, let it be releases

DarkCat09 commented on issue DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#4 2025-03-14 16:48:57 +03:00
ci: check remote repos for updates

Or maybe not by creating a release...

Is there a convenient mechanism to trigger CI? Can an update-checker-bot create empty commits?

DarkCat09 opened issue DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#4 2025-03-14 16:47:14 +03:00
ci: check remote repos for updates
DarkCat09 commented on issue DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#3 2025-03-14 16:40:36 +03:00
ci: run Piped build after OpenJ9

@nm17, could you help plz?

DarkCat09 opened issue DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#3 2025-03-14 16:40:25 +03:00
ci: run Piped build after OpenJ9
DarkCat09 deleted branch dev/dc09 from DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped 2025-03-14 16:28:37 +03:00
DarkCat09 commented on pull request DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#2 2025-03-14 16:28:29 +03:00
clang

Btw, why not share the backtrace

(cflags/cxxflags are -O0 -g -no-flto -Wno-error=nontrivial-memcall)

(lldb) r
Process 193 launched: '/build/src/build/linux-x86_64-server-slowdebug/jdk…
DarkCat09 commented on pull request DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#2 2025-03-14 16:24:45 +03:00
clang

I gave up after two days of investigating the issue, do not think that i didn't even tried lldb

DarkCat09 commented on pull request DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#2 2025-03-14 16:22:56 +03:00
clang

OpenJ9 gives segfault (even on java --version) when built with clang-20.

DarkCat09 closed pull request DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#2 2025-03-14 16:22:17 +03:00
clang
DarkCat09 created pull request DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped#2 2025-03-14 16:22:07 +03:00
clang
DarkCat09 pushed to dev/dc09 at DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped 2025-03-14 16:16:57 +03:00
842b23b553 a
DarkCat09 created branch dev/dc09 in DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped 2025-03-14 13:16:07 +03:00
DarkCat09 pushed to dev/dc09 at DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped 2025-03-14 13:16:07 +03:00
8b0c793c98 disable optimizations to fix segfault
DarkCat09 pushed to main at DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped 2025-03-13 20:29:45 +03:00
dfe051d2c6 fix: ...pointer to non-trivially copyable type...
DarkCat09 pushed to main at DarkCat09/docker-openj9-piped 2025-03-13 20:16:34 +03:00
86522ff431 fix(clang): this time it must work